|
Hey, if you don’t like my politics, that’s fine. That’s what the comments are for. Feel free to call me an idiot, agree with me, or say whatever makes you happy. If you don’t like my choice of pictures, that’s fine too. But don’t complain about it, especially with some lame passive-aggressive comment. Just go somewhere else. I won’t even notice. I promise. For everyone else, enjoy the P&A. That’s Pussy and Army, of course, but you knew that, right? |
![]()




(56 votes)

Makes me want to go search the attic for my old box of army men….and then go ask my girfriend if she’ll help me play with them.
Happily, I bet Nick won’t even notice =o)
I wonder why those little figures are usually called “army men” rather than soldiers; I almost never hear “army man” in any other context.
The soldier on top… would you call him a bush whacker?
No, this is an AM-BUSH! (He can’t be a bush whacker…. no bush knife!!)
Though the right hand soldier could be hollering to the tunnel guard, “Hey I’m BUSH-ED! Butt I found no critters….”
I got so many bad Ideas from this pic…..
Fire in the hole?
The skin tone looks a little too light for this to be the Rhodesian Bush War.
Gives a whole new meaning to “in the trenches”……….
It looks like they had to struggle through a vast field of stubble to get into position. I’ll bet that their cheeks are raw…
Airy ain’t it. Wadja expect, feathers?
Just a reminder men… Always change your socks regularly when marching through wet terrain…