|
“Take a picture, it’ll last longer.” |
![]()
|
“Take a picture, it’ll last longer.” |
![]()
![]()
DMCA Notice: If you own the copyright to any picture and
wish to receive credit or have it removed, please contact me and I will respond promptly.
I will not
respond to third-party requests, hearsay, or assumptions—only to the legitimate copyright holder. - Nick
![]()
First CPR, then picture taking.
Will we never get a rest?
And when I’m looking again, the woman on the right somehow looks photoshopped into the original picture.
I agree on the photoshop. Woman on the left has two light sources and a much lighter shadow from her hair than the one on the right.
I don’t think it’s Photoshopped. It looks more like a depth of field issue, especially since there’s nothing in the middle distance to compare it to.
Another thing to think about before you cry Photoshop: WHY would anyone Photoshop the image? I mean, this is two nudists on a beach. It’s not an Iranian missile test or Obama’s birth certificate. You know?
Composition. They didn’t have one photo with both women in it, and wanted one. Sorta like the case of NatGeo moving the pyramid:
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/photo_database/image/the_case_of_the_moving_pyramids/
What about left one’s right tit?
She doesn’t look like she is bouncing in front of a long exposure shot?
Either way, that is one of few red heads that I actually want to photoshop out of the pic. Don’t ask me why, I just get the feeling that she doesn’t belong in the pic for some reason.
Not Photoshopped. Apart from Nick’s reasoning of ‘why bother with this photo’ there’s a much simpler explanation as to why the one on the left has two light sources. There’s an assistant standing off cam holding a reflector on her to help balance out the exposure.
Ok, no Photoshop. The redhead was photographed ten years after the dark-haired one. She was then cut out and glued onto the first one.
Reason: Two girls to jack off to.
I’ll have one of each please!
I agree on the photoshop. Woman on the left has two light sources and a much lighter shadow from her hair than the one on the right.
Moved comment…still no delete button 8^(
Yeah … while ya two guys keep going bout Photoshop and light source … I am gonna doggie style those two right on the beach
Decisions, decisions! I lean towards the red head with the nice trimmed bush and perky tits. CPR – Hmmmmmm! Plus the light one will have a bad burn at the end of the day and she will be burned everywhere but her bush and head so no position will be comfortable for her.
You talk about photoshop and light sources when no one mentions Milla Jovovich’s and Tila Tequila’s faces shopped onto those bodies?
As someone who has spend some time in nudist camps, I noticed something that no one has commented on: tan lines
The left hand girl has practically no tan, but she looks like a naturist. The ‘redhead’ (she tans too well for a redhead) has tan lines galore, so she spends her time in a Bikini, not on a nude beach. She looks too brassy to be a nudist.
I must concur with Nick’s comment that the picture wasn’t altered in any way. THe one to the left is oblivious of the camera while the one on the right is very aware of the camera…
If you look closely, the brunette does have tan lines. Just not as pronounced. The redhead appears to be a dye job to me though.
Now, concerning the light issue, it is possible that red is far enough away from the secondary light that she does bot get illuminated adequately by it.